Summary
Shane Smith (VICE founder) and Andrew Callaghan (Channel 5) travel to Iran and interview Mohammad Bagherian of "Explosive Media" (Akhbar Enfejari / "Explosive News"), the anonymous-ish team behind the pro-Iran AI-generated Lego propaganda videos that went viral during the 2026 Iran–Israel–US conflict. Bagherian frames the work as a patriotic and religious "duty," insists the team is "completely independent" of the government — then, in the same breath, concedes the Iranian state is among the media outlets that buy their footage ("the government is one of your customers… this isn't strange"). He invokes Baudrillard's hyperreality to argue the West fights with fabricated realities and that his team are the "guerrillas of the media war" — "our weapon is AI." The interview is genuinely candid and humanising, which is what gives it its appeal; but on the specific question of VICE's objectivity, the framing is sympathetic and several of the interviewee's load-bearing claims (independence, the ~900-million / "nearly a billion views" figure, the "we just teach the truth" self-image) go unchallenged on camera. The single sharpest moment — pinning down that the regime is a paying customer — actually mirrors a harder admission the BBC had already extracted.
Key points
- Who they are: "Explosive Media" / Akhbar Enfejari ("Explosive News") — a team Bagherian says is "fewer than 10 people," widely reported as ~10 Iranian students aged roughly 18–25, producing near-daily AI Lego videos mocking Trump, Netanyahu and the US during the 2026 war.
- The headline tension — independence vs. "customer": Bagherian claims total independence and that no one tells them to support their country, yet concedes state-affiliated media buy their videos. The BBC had already gotten "Mr Explosive" to admit the regime is a "customer" — a claim he'd previously denied. Independence and "the regime pays us for our output" are hard to hold simultaneously.
- Analysts dispute the "grassroots" framing: Mahsa Alimardani (WITNESS) argues that in a country with Iran's internet restrictions, having the bandwidth to generate and upload at this scale means you are "officially or unofficially cooperating with the regime." That structural argument is never put to Bagherian in the VICE cut.
- "Our weapon is AI": The thesis Bagherian and Smith both land on — meme/AI content as a legitimate, asymmetric instrument of information warfare ("guerrillas of the media war," a Quranic "small group defeats a large group" framing). Smith's intro calls it "the future of war propaganda."
- The Baudrillard move: Bagherian's most intellectually serious point — that an adversary operating in hyperreality can't be beaten with facts ("showing Trump the vote counts doesn't work; you defeat him on his own ground"). It's a coherent media-theory argument, and notably it's also a justification for fighting fabrication with fabrication.
- The "we only teach truth" self-image goes unchallenged: Bagherian repeatedly frames the videos as awareness-raising and truth-telling, while independent reporting documents factual fabrications in the videos (e.g., fake claims of captured US pilots and successful strikes). The interview does not surface those specific falsehoods.
- On VICE's objectivity (the viewer's question): This is access journalism — sympathetic, curious, "everybody's point of view" framing. It humanises the subjects and lets them speak, which is valuable and honest in tone. But it is not adversarial: the strongest counter-narratives (analyst attribution, documented fabrications) are largely absent, and the one genuinely probing question (the "customer" one) was already public via the BBC. Honest register, soft scrutiny.
- Reach claims are unverified: "Nearly a billion views" / "~900 million people" is the team's own figure, attributed to an unnamed "university study." Independent outlets describe the reach more cautiously as "millions" to "billions of views" across platforms, and note it's unclear how much real influence it had.
Fact check
Focus per the request: verifying the interview's factual claims and assessing VICE's objectivity. Claims are the interviewee's unless noted; verdicts reflect external reporting, not the interview itself.
| Claim | Verdict | Notes | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| "We are completely independent… we don't need the government's support" | ⚡ Misleading | Stated as independence, but in the same interview he concedes state-affiliated media buy the videos, and the BBC separately got "Mr Explosive" to admit the regime is a "customer" — which he had previously denied. Analysts argue that operating at this scale under Iran's internet restrictions implies at least unofficial cooperation. | BBC via Yahoo; Euronews |
| "The Iranian government is one of our customers… this isn't strange" | ✅ Confirmed | Consistent with the BBC's reporting that the regime is a paying "customer" of Explosive Media; this is the interview's most candid moment. | BBC via Yahoo |
| "Our team is fewer than 10 people" | ✅ Confirmed | Matches outside reporting describing a team of around 10 (commonly reported as students aged ~18–25). | Times of Israel; Euronews |
| "Around 900 million people / nearly a billion views" (attributed to an unnamed university study) | ❓ Unverified | The figure is the team's own, citing an unnamed study. Independent outlets describe reach more cautiously — "millions" to "billions of views" across platforms — and note real influence is unclear. No named, verifiable source for the 900M figure. | Euronews; Fortune |
| "We are finally teaching people the truth / history that Western media hid" (self-image) | ⚡ Misleading | The videos are documented to contain fabrications (e.g., false claims of captured US pilots and successful strikes). Framing the output as truth-telling is contradicted by independent fact-checking; the interview does not surface these specific falsehoods. | Times of Israel |
| "YouTube banned the videos" (context, not stated by interviewee) | ✅ Confirmed | YouTube removed/banned the videos during the conflict; they continued circulating on X, TikTok and Instagram. | Yahoo/BBC |
| "Trump's AI tweets get country/city names wrong and show planes with three wings" | ❓ Unverified | Plausible — AI-generated political imagery routinely contains such artifacts, and the Trump administration's use of AI-generated content (incl. the Gaza "country club" video referenced) is documented — but the specific "three-winged plane" example was not independently located. | Euronews |
| Reference to Jean Baudrillard and "hyperreality" | ✅ Confirmed | Baudrillard is a real philosopher and hyperreality/simulacra is his actual concept; the interviewee uses it coherently (whatever one makes of the application). | Hyperreality (Wikipedia) |
| VICE objectivity (the viewer's question) | ⚠️ Partially Confirmed | The interview is honest in tone and humanising — genuine access journalism that lets the subject speak. But it is sympathetic and largely non-adversarial: it does not put the analyst attribution, the bandwidth-implies-cooperation argument, or the videos' documented fabrications to the interviewee, and its sharpest moment (the "customer" admission) was already public via the BBC. Honest register, soft scrutiny — not the same as balanced verification. | Euronews; BBC via Yahoo |
Related resources
| Type | Name | URL | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎥 | "Our Weapon Is AI" — Shane Smith & Andrew Callaghan interview Iran's meme warriors (VICE) | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DjrqMrCeC0 | The source interview |
| 🎙️ | Shane Smith Has Questions | https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/shane-smith-has-questions/id1771901576 | The VICE podcast this segment belongs to |
| 📰 | "The regime is a customer" — BBC interviews activist behind pro-Iran Lego videos (via Yahoo) | https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/regime-customer-bbc-interviews-activist-171650758.html | BBC got the "customer" admission first |
| 📰 | Pro-Iran groups using AI to troll Trump and control the war narrative — Euronews | https://www.euronews.com/2026/04/09/pro-iran-groups-using-ai-to-troll-trump-and-try-to-control-war-narrative-analysts-say | Analyst attribution to Tehran (Alimardani, Lavie-Driver, Snow) |
| 📰 | From anti-Israel Legos to fake footage: Iran's AI propaganda owns the digital battlefield — Times of Israel | https://www.timesofisrael.com/from-anti-israel-legos-to-fake-footage-irans-ai-propaganda-owns-the-digital-battlefield/ | Documents fabrications in the videos |
| 📰 | What are the Lego videos, AI-generated Iran propaganda — Fortune | https://fortune.com/2026/04/09/what-are-lego-videos-ai-generated-iran-propaganda/ | Background on the phenomenon |
| 🔗 | Jean Baudrillard — Hyperreality / Simulacra and Simulation | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperreality | The philosophical frame Bagherian invokes |
Transcript
(click to expand)
Auto-generated transcript — may contain transcription errors.
Note: The interviewer's questions were spoken in English; Mohammad Bagherian's answers were spoken in Farsi. The Farsi answers below are translated from the video's Persian auto-captions (YouTube), reconstructed and interleaved in sequence. Translations are by the research library and approximate; [trans.] marks a translated answer.
Andrew (intro): Andrew Callaghan and I started podcasting together. We said, hey, let's go somewhere and break some news. So we got into Iran. Iran's like every other place — you got kids, old people, families, like everywhere else.
Shane Smith (intro): The Lego videos are so interesting because they're kind of a brand new thing. And they've literally had, you know, nearly a billion views. It became a phenomenon — sort of putting out the Iranian point of view, propaganda if you will, but in a lighter, comedic fashion. It's new. It's a new way of waging war and propaganda. The interview you're about to see was a very difficult interview to do. Why? Because these guys are very concerned about their safety, as they should be. They had to be in a remote warehouse that we didn't know about. They wanted to keep it short so they couldn't be traced. These young guys are making these films that are seen by hundreds of millions of people, and they see what they're doing as God's work, literally.
Interviewer: For starters, one question I have — for the people unaware, how would you describe what it is that you do?
Mohammad Bagherian: [trans.] We actually describe our work as a duty. When we go out into the streets and ask people, they want to do something bigger for their country. A shopkeeper says, "I wish I were in the Red Crescent," or "I wish I could sit behind an air-defence gun." This was our duty — the work we could do, the work we knew how to do — and we see it as our duty toward our country. We're proud of the part of our work that raises awareness among the people of the world.
Interviewer: That's an interesting point, because you're saying that with Lego cartoons — and I believe in the BBC interview you said you use Lego because real violence pushes the audience away — the young people are seeing your Lego cartoons and saying, "Hey, that's the real news," versus the news they see on TV.
Mohammad Bagherian: [trans.] The people of the world, especially the West, have for years been under the propaganda of Western media. The feedback we get from our audience is exactly this — they say, "You are finally teaching us. You're teaching history, you're teaching reality. Our own media didn't teach us this." Their views, and the views of those around them, about Iran, about this war, about our politicians, change. That's where we take pride in ourselves.
Interviewer: Do you think the Internet has now turned geopolitics into something like fandom culture? [And that young people see your Lego cartoons as the real news?]
Mohammad Bagherian: [trans.] Yes, exactly right, and the reason is that the human being has an essence inclined toward truth. They were under false propaganda for years, but now that they've found the truth, they're instinctively drawn to it. I think the suppression of truth over the years made it like a compressed spring — and now it has sprung out.
Interviewer: Some people online would say that what you guys are doing is kind of like government propaganda dressed up as internet culture. How do you respond to that criticism?
[Music playing]
Mohammad Bagherian: [trans.] We are completely independent. The ideas are our own. The decisions are our own. What we make and don't make is our own. And if we support our country, we don't need the government's support. No one needs to tell us to support our country. We support our country independently and of our own will.
Interviewer: You also said the Iranian government is one of your customers. Is that true?
Mohammad Bagherian: [trans.] Like any other media outlet in the world, after we finish our production, various media outlets buy the broadcast rights to our footage — our videos — from us. Sometimes some of these media may be state-affiliated. This isn't strange. Our video is high quality and many media want to buy it from us.
Interviewer: Talking about Trump, and how the Trump administration since the most recent electoral victory has used AI-generated videos all the time — like the video of the Gaza Strip, the Gaza hotel with Elon Musk throwing a bunch of money, what was supposed to be a country club built atop the rubble. Is this kind of a semi tongue-in-cheek reaction to that, a way to counter that narrative by using AI?
Mohammad Bagherian: [trans.] [Placed next to ours,] it shows its own level — how low it is, media-wise, in quality, and how anti-reality it is. They take a place they destroyed and razed to the ground and say, with AI, "we're going to develop it." The reason is that hands stained with blood cannot write ideas that sit in the human heart. Hearts turned to stone cannot produce humor, cannot produce a compelling narrative.
Interviewer: So what are some examples of Western-backed media outlets and politicians using AI to push their own agenda?
Mohammad Bagherian: [trans.] Trump's tweets themselves are very interesting — in them the AI he uses gets the names of countries and cities wrong; the planes, some of them have three wings. Trump's tweets are great — we can really see an interesting picture of American statesmanship and what it has become.
Interviewer: Maybe getting a bit more metaphysical. You've referenced Baudrillard, the philosopher. With Baudrillard and hyperreality, politics and war have become emotionally consumed as media experiences.
Mohammad Bagherian: [trans.] It's the same thing Jean Baudrillard said — when your enemy no longer has anything to do with reality, and has built a reality as hyperreality and emphasizes it, having set reality aside, you can't fight him in reality. When Trump keeps saying "the election was rigged, the election was rigged," showing him the vote counts doesn't work. You have to enter his field and defeat him on his own ground.
Interviewer: Let's keep you on this theme. What scares you personally most about AI-generated political media?
Mohammad Bagherian: [trans.] When they turned war — especially across the whole world — into a film, into entertainment, turned the spilling of people's blood into a game, that's where the free people of the world entered. They took reality into hyperreality, entered their game, and we are that hand of vengeance that is going to get even on behalf of the oppressed people. Before this, they dragged entertainment and media into vulgarity. Television, the camera, cinema — which could have raised people's awareness — they dragged it all into vulgarity again, bringing politics into sexual matters. On this side of things, I think we'll surpass them.
Interviewer: Do you know how many people have seen your videos? Have you done the math on how far and wide, how many engagements your content has gotten since you started posting?
Mohammad Bagherian: [trans.] I think around 900 million people — up to about two or three weeks ago, according to a university study given to us — had seen our videos.
Interviewer: What was the most popular video you've ever posted?
Mohammad Bagherian: [trans.] The "Loser" video, I think, was our most popular.
[Music playing]
Mohammad Bagherian: [trans.] This was actually the first video that came with rap. It was the video where the Lexus [character] started the movement, and people came [for] the other videos.
Interviewer: So nearly a billion people have watched your videos — obviously you've struck a chord. Close your eyes: in one, two, three years, especially with photoreal AI coming online, where does this AI-driven, consumer-led content go?
Mohammad Bagherian: [trans.] [AI] has become unpredictable and development is taking shape very fast. We try to keep ourselves in sync with it and to keep moving forward, not stop. We know that they — the enemies of humanity, the enemies of truth — will certainly do things, and we try, as we have until now, to be the guerrillas of the media war. To be the "Gorillaz" of the media war. Our team at the media outlet is fewer than 10 people.
Interviewer: So you think God has effectively intended for the phone to become mightier than the sword?
Mohammad Bagherian: [trans.] This is a Quranic verse that says: how many a small group has, by God's leave, defeated a large group. By God's grace, with His permission... Yes, anything can be a weapon. Just as they used everything as a weapon, now our weapon is AI; our weapon is the phone and media — and of course all weapons are in God's hand.
Interviewer: Thank you for taking the time. I know you don't do this very often. We're here in Iran, trying to get everybody's point of view about what's happening in a very nuanced and confusing time. Thank you very much. Keep doing your thing. Thank you for producing all of this content — it's helping inform us from the opposite side of the world.
Mohammad Bagherian: You're welcome. Thank you for your time.